Report of the American Atlantic Council, which accused Russia and Syria of indiscriminate attacks on Aleppo, was called propaganda in the Russian Defense Ministry. According to the Ministry representative Igor Konashenkov, this document can be easily refuted by testimonies of thousands of Syrians who returned to normal life.

Notably the report doesn’t say a word about mined schools or warehouses of militants full of food and medicines. But the so-called "civil activists” that are supported by Americans and called "clowns in white helmets” by Konashenkov didn’t report these facts. It's not advantageous. Anna Redkina on who and how writes such reports if we may call them so.

From the "indisputable evidence of Assad's crimes" and "deliberate attacks on civilians" to “a report every line of which is a lie”. News about the release of a 70-page conclusion report by the American Atlantic Council on Aleppo was published in the most diverse interpretations by the media of nearly all the UN member states.

However, officials who dared to comment can be counted on fingers of one hand. The authors themselves remained silent. Branded unwavering confidence and determination in action. Well, if the North Atlantic Alliance, NATO, didn’t succeed, perhaps, the Atlantic Council will get lucky? But since when does the New World conquer cities by persuasion? We have carefully studied the report of the Atlantic Council dedicated to operations of Syrian troops to liberate Aleppo, but found nothing new in it. All the charges and propaganda have been denied long ago.

Even twice, by the facts from our official briefings and by life, in the testimonies and interviews of thousands of residents of the eastern districts of Aleppo returning to a normal and peaceful life. Questions arise as early as the research stage. Seems like this time the eminent experts were inspired not only by field reports and the expertise results of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, but also by the achievements of web designers from the Silicon Valley. At first you're offered the mandatory opening scenes. Dimmed colors and music, breathtaking flight of the camera over the city. It seems that a movie or a TV series is about to start. However, the proposed alternative is no less fascinating.

Themed solitaire of interactive windows, which hide multiple videos, in the sidebar there are maps, chronology of the conflict, and even thematic groups on Facebook and Twitter. Do you still want to see this boring document? This political victory was achieved largely through the cooperation of three states. Those are Russia, Turkey, and Iran. "If it hadn’t been for this cooperation, primarily the Russian-Turkish cooperation, I believe that there would have been no political victory. In this case, we wouldn’t be able to talk about any cooperation in the liberation of Aleppo from the radical Islamists. And the report itself is a faded shade of its cover and, what's worse, a bad parody on the work of scientists and experts".

Starting with starving children, the authors monotonically recreate the history of once the largest city of Syria according to the information of media and social networks. As if collecting information on the spot, analysis of the physical evidence, ballistics, and even the photos of the vaunted US satellites existed for someone else. It's no surprise that the description of the first so-called tests of the so-called secret weapon of the Russian Aerospace Forces on Syrian territory starts as early as the fifth page. Says who? Where is the reference? Here it is! The video! The montage you are watching. This is an organization that has a certain reputation as an organization that provides assistance. This organization periodically releases freely available photos, videos, and other materials that are of the level of propaganda, fake propaganda. And it does exist. This is true. Unfortunately, there is nothing good about it.

White Helmets, numerous observation groups, and tweets of nonexistent Syrian children. All of these evidence can be questioned just by common logic. With time, more and more consumers of the "News from Aleppo" begin to notice the perfect English of the residents of Arab border zone or high-speed Internet. However, it's useless to address questions to the owners of profile pages. If the author answers, the whole absurdity of the correspondence will be hidden under thousands of new comments from the all-purpose troopers of this information war. So, perhaps we should say thank you to those who decided to publish this report? Now we have not only missing photographs and fictional characters, but real faces. Notable critics of our country, former key characters of world politics Madeleine Albright and Carl Bildt, authors of this report. Perhaps we should ask them who is responsible for this hack?